CAROLYN’S COMPOSITIONS
SHOOTING SNAPSHOTS: TERRORISTIC ACTIVITY?
I want to thank George F. Will. A recent newspaper column he authored, A snapshot of our times*, has me concerned.
Will cites examples of photographers questioned about their terroristic tendencies due to the subjects included in their photographs. One was photographing controversial new turn styles in the Los Angeles subway. Another was photographing industrial scenery at night.
Still another was taking photographs to accompany a news article. The issue about his photographs was the presence of a courthouse in the background.
Why do these examples raise a concern?
When the Los Angeles Police Department developed a Suspicious Activity Report program, the federal government encouraged local law enforcement agencies to adopt its guidelines for gathering information “that could indicate activity or intentions related to” terrorism…From the fact that terrorists might take pictures of potential infrastructure targets (“pre-operational surveillance”), it is a short slide down a slippery slope to the judgment that photography is a potential indicator of terrorism and hence photographers are suspect when taking pictures “with no apparent aesthetic value” (words from the suspicious-activity guidelines).* (bold print mine)
Deputies detained and searched the turn style photographer, and asked him if he was planning to sell the photos to al-Qaeda. When the photographer claimed his right to remain silent the deputy said You know, I’ll just submit your name to TLO (the Terrorism Liason Officer program). Every time your driver’s license gets scanned, every time you take a plane, any time you go on any type of public transit system where they look at your identification, you’re going to be stopped. You will be detained. You’ll be searched. You will be on the FBI’s hit list.*
The industrial scenery photographer finds aestheticism and occasional monetary value in depicting nighttime industrial scenes on film. One night, however, while on a public sidewalk photographing an oil refinery with a large camera on a tripod, deputies ordered him to stop taking pictures, lest they put his name on a troublesome FBI list.*
A journalist, writing a story on drivers distracted by texting and use of hand-held phones, was taking illustrative pictures at an intersection. A courthouse was in the background. Deputies called the courthouse a “critical facility” and labeled his picture-taking as “suspicious activity,” gave him a pat-down search, and demanded to see the pictures he had taken.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
In the decade since Sept. 11, 2001, the United States has comprehensively reduced civil liberties in the name of (more…)
Shooting Snapshots: Terroristic Activity?
Tags: All, All posts, Cameras and tourism, COMMENTARY, Contemplation, Daily Life, Freedom for photographers, George F. Will. A snapshot of our times, JOURNAL, Journaling, Latest post, Life, Lifestream, Lifestyle, Misc., Miscellaneous, Musings, Op Ed, Opinion, Photographers, Photographers and terrorism tendencies, Photographs with no apparent aesthetic value, Photography, postaday2011, Reflections, Rights for photographers, Suspicious Activity Report program on infrastructure photographs, The National Defense Authorization Act, This is where I've been, Thoughts
CAROLYN’S COMPOSITIONS
SHOOTING SNAPSHOTS: TERRORISTIC ACTIVITY?
I want to thank George F. Will. A recent newspaper column he authored, A snapshot of our times*, has me concerned.
Will cites examples of photographers questioned about their terroristic tendencies due to the subjects included in their photographs. One was photographing controversial new turn styles in the Los Angeles subway. Another was photographing industrial scenery at night.
Still another was taking photographs to accompany a news article. The issue about his photographs was the presence of a courthouse in the background.
Why do these examples raise a concern?
When the Los Angeles Police Department developed a Suspicious Activity Report program, the federal government encouraged local law enforcement agencies to adopt its guidelines for gathering information “that could indicate activity or intentions related to” terrorism…From the fact that terrorists might take pictures of potential infrastructure targets (“pre-operational surveillance”), it is a short slide down a slippery slope to the judgment that photography is a potential indicator of terrorism and hence photographers are suspect when taking pictures “with no apparent aesthetic value” (words from the suspicious-activity guidelines).* (bold print mine)
Deputies detained and searched the turn style photographer, and asked him if he was planning to sell the photos to al-Qaeda. When the photographer claimed his right to remain silent the deputy said You know, I’ll just submit your name to TLO (the Terrorism Liason Officer program). Every time your driver’s license gets scanned, every time you take a plane, any time you go on any type of public transit system where they look at your identification, you’re going to be stopped. You will be detained. You’ll be searched. You will be on the FBI’s hit list.*
The industrial scenery photographer finds aestheticism and occasional monetary value in depicting nighttime industrial scenes on film. One night, however, while on a public sidewalk photographing an oil refinery with a large camera on a tripod, deputies ordered him to stop taking pictures, lest they put his name on a troublesome FBI list.*
A journalist, writing a story on drivers distracted by texting and use of hand-held phones, was taking illustrative pictures at an intersection. A courthouse was in the background. Deputies called the courthouse a “critical facility” and labeled his picture-taking as “suspicious activity,” gave him a pat-down search, and demanded to see the pictures he had taken.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
In the decade since Sept. 11, 2001, the United States has comprehensively reduced civil liberties in the name of (more…)